Why Should The Voting Age Be Raised To 21

If Congress concludes: that the justifications in favor of extending the franchise outweigh the justifications for restricting the franchise) then Congress has the power to change the law by statute and grant the vote to 18 year-olds, even though in the absence of action by Congress, the Supreme Court would have upheld state laws setting the voting age at 21. Studies of voting behavior in recent elections have consistently shown that persons under 30 vote less often than those who are older. This is especially concerning since there are certain issues, such as environmental degradation, public education policy, long-term government debt, corporal punishment laws, and poverty that impact young people more than anyone else. If we look at the voting age, adjusting it is certainly a very broad and general measure. If you give people the right to vote earlier in life, they are more likely to build a lasting habit. Left unchecked, these crises will lead to wider gaps in political participation and representation. Since the lowering of the draft age to 18 years in 1942, seven separate proposals to lower the voting age in all states to 18 years have been offered in Congress. This not only allows people to make a much more informed decision on who they are voting for, but also allows them to carefully reflect on why they are to choose one candidate over another, whether it be in terms of the Presidency, the House of Representatives, the Senate, or even in local elections for mayor or chairmen of their respective cities. Why should the voting age be raised to 21 mai. I think that people should be able to vote and we should lower the age to 16. "Everything hinges on voting rights, " said Ross.

• Why should the voting age be raised to 21 mai
• Why the voting age should be 18
• Why we should raise the voting age
• Should the voting age be raised

Why Should The Voting Age Be Raised To 21 Mai

Prevents setting higher. But the same can be said for adults. Should the voting age be raised. That's because the 26th Amendment to the U. As I have indicated, I believe that Congress has ample authority under the Constitution to reduce the voting age to 18 by statute, without the necessity for a constitutional amendment. As the text of the Fourteenth Amendment makes clear, however, the provisions of the Equal Protection Clause are not merely enforceable through litigation in the courts.

Why The Voting Age Should Be 18

In 2013, when Takoma Park, Maryland, lowered its voting age to 16, registered voters under 18 had a turnout rate four times higher than voters over 18. In addition, many 18 year olds do not have a plan(s) after high school, so if they can't make a decision about their future what makes people think that they can make an informed decision about the future of the country. The legal position I have stated is supported by two of the most eminent constitutional authorities in America. I would like to speak to an election manager, if one can be found. In a democracy, we don't deny people the vote because we think they might vote badly. Eighty-seven percent of Black youth and 67 percent of Latino youth voted for a Democratic candidate—compared to 57 percent of young white voters. Gen Z helped to stop the ‘red wave’ in the midterms. The Republicans’ response? Try to raise the voting age | Arwa Mahdawi | The Guardian. There is no talk of also raising the age for military enlistment or, say, consent. However, on the basis of our broad experience with 18 to 21 year-olds: as a class, I believe they possess the requisite maturity, judgment, and stability for responsible exercise of the franchise. The Republicans' response?

Why We Should Raise The Voting Age

A different survey found 8% support for lowering the voting age to 16; 45% want to keep it at 18; and 46% would like to raise it back to age 21. To be sure, it is possible to invoke additional constitutional arguments in each of these areas, but the distinctions are small, and the Morgan case must necessarily be the principal justification. Why the voting age should be 18. People under 18 can leave school, get a job, drive a car and pay taxes. As mentioned, there was an opinion poll in Norway in January showing 23 percent support for a higher voting age. In our constitutional system, however, the judicial branch is ill-suited to the sort of detailed fact-finding investigation that is necessary to weigh the many complex considerations underlying one or another requirement for voting.

Should The Voting Age Be Raised

There is a growing national consensus that they deserve the franchise, and I feel that Congress has the power to act, and ought to act, on that consensus. Merely because they were adopted at a later date than the original Constitution, they are no less significant. In sum, I believe that the basic constitutional arguments supporting the power of Congress to change voting qualifications by statute are the same in the case of literacy, residence, or age. In 2009, Senator Kennedy and Senator Hatch introduced the Serve America Act. But San Francisco would be the first big U. S. city to do it. Many people are not voting because they don't believe it can help them and their community also with the support from 16-17 years old, it can show a huge difference on how the votes are increasing little by little. “The voting age should stay at 18,” says students. Want to see the rest of this article? The historic decision by the Supreme Court in the case of Katzenbach v. Morgan in June 1966 provides a solid constitutional basis for legislation by Congress in this area. If Your Time is short.

We saw this in the recent student-led protests on climate change policy. Young women voted for Democratic House candidates at higher rates than men—71 percent to 53 percent. Yet, in the Morgan case, the Supreme Court made it unmistakably clear that Congress had the power to override the State interest. With all that's at stake for equality, we are redoubling our commitment for the next 50 years. Are Republicans Afraid of Young Voters. In other words, Congress is given the power under Section 5 to enact legislation to enforce the Equal Protection Clause, the Due Process Clause, and all the other great provisions contained in Section 1 of the Amendment. Seen in perspective, the Morgan case was not a new departure in American constitutional law.

"Personally, I am appalled, and I would like to give them the benefit of the doubt – that they weren't trying to do it – and it's simply legislative language that needs to get cleaned up as part of the process, " Brobst said.